Plague Journal, To Start Over Again
I have been thinking about René Descartes. Descartes made a world changing discovery on November 10, 1619. Descartes was a 17th century mathematician, upper class, university educated and was well-traveled in Europe. Descartes, uneasy with his learning based upon Medieval scholasticism, couldn’t discount nagging doubt triggered by the discoveries of Galileo, by the rise of “reason” proclaimed by Francis Bacon. Descartes desired certainty, a bedrock foundation of knowledge. In the words written in his autobiographical Discourse on Method:
I remained a whole day shut up alone in a stove-heated room, where I had complete leisure to occupy myself with my own thoughts.
There he made his great discovery:
“Cogito, Ergo Sum.” — I think therefore, I am.
Descartes believed he had discovered the foundations of a wonderful new science. The following night “having gone to bed all full of his inspiration and wholly occupied with the thought” of his great discovery, “he was visited by three consecutive dreams, which he believed came from on high.” Descartes gave thanks to God and pledged himself to make a pilgrimage to the shrine of the Blessed Virgin at Loretto. Descartes, the apostle of reason nevertheless was a pious catholic.
Why is this 17th century story important, crucial to understand the political impasse, existential vertigo, and social cul de sac of the West on November 9th 2021?
Descartes grasped that methodological doubt cannot dissuade the subject doubting, — that he or she exists. Thinking (or doubting) proved beyond doubt, the reality of a self. Therefore, the thinking agent is a certain foundation for all of the operations of reason. Doubt itself, awareness of movement of the mind is convincing proof, that a self is competent to exercise reason, that expansive departments of knowledge can be securely built upon this foundation, that the individual is qualified to make choices sufficient to construct republics of free citizens. Both the French and the American revolutions were inspired by these considerations…
How has the assertion, that the self is the bedrock of reason worked out? How are we doing? The events of January 6th should give us pause. Without success, a citizen mob assaulted the halls of Congress with the battle cry “take back our country.” A failed coup in a democratic republic ostensibly founded upon reason… The perpetrators having a significant power base in congress retain their freedom, will again attempt to seize control by any means in their power.
Having read this far, you are likely to be asking, “So what is your point?”
1. Reason is adequate for solving near term problems. And that is all. eg. How many hours drive to Asheville? How much salt should I add to the cookie dough?
2. To assume reason is universal, and that education is sufficient to channel the inclination of the mind to wander, to be influenced by advertising, to be seduced by propaganda, — is a fundamental mistake.
3. We have underestimated the ubiquity of stupidity. Stupidity: the will to cause damage to one’s fellowman/women without any benefit to one’s self. Education is no vaccination against stupidity. A Phd can be stupid.
4. Has the time come for a new beginning, time to start over again?
Riders On The Storm
By The Doors
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Into this house we’re born
Into this world we’re thrown
Like a dog without a bone
An actor out on loan
Riders on the storm
There’s a killer on the road
His brain is squirmin’ like a toad
Take a long holiday
Let your children play
If you give this man a ride
Sweet family will die
Killer on the road, yeah
Girl, you gotta love your man
Girl, you gotta love your man
Take him by the hand
Make him understand
The world on you depends
Our life will never end
Gotta love your man, yeah
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Into this house we’re born
Into this world we’re thrown
Like a dog without a bone
An actor out on loan.
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Riders on the storm
Lyrics by Jim Morrison
4 thoughts on “Plague Journal, To Start Over Again”
Stupidity provides balance in the world. Nature demands balance; stupid to one extent, ranging to extremely bright the other. Yet, if I am extremely bright am I equally smart?
I firmly believe we are well past the time to start over again. Where do we start? How do do it? How do we effect peaceful change? I am a Doors fan and need to discuss with you your thoughts on their er relevance to what you have presented.
Very tired, daylight savings time is killing me tonight.
I’ve never thought of stupidity as balancing anything. Imbalance is more the case. I remember being bullied by a couple of classmates in the 4th grade. As far as I could tell they were immune to the anguish their threats caused in others. No doubt they learned to be violent from a family member.
We’d have to agree on definitions of being bright and smart.
Starting over is never simple, or freely chosen. Something that you believe that you must do, never mind the extreme risk. Success is undefined and you may not have the resources to reach the goal, a new and better way of life. Here I am speaking of “starting over” as an individual. I do not have a clue about what that might be like for an entire society. What are the odds of a bloodless, non-violent rotation of the axis of an entire society? What motivated the French to execute Louis XVI in 1754? Kings were NEVER executed as they were divinely sanctioned. Surely they felt they had no other way forward.
As Jim Morrison wrote we are “riders on the storm.”
Life is killing me…
My friend Charlie insists he has a Republican dog. The dog’s afternoon lunch can be sitting idly in the dish on the floor. Dog is not hungry. Charlie picks up the dish. Dog growls, barks, jumps around, and generally makes a fuss. Until Charlie puts the dish back down on the floor. Dog immediately quiets down and continues ignoring the food.
Dog is a Republican; he really doesn’t want the food, but he REALLY doesn’t want anyone else to have it.
Is Dog just being stupid here?
Perhaps Dog is thinking, “I may get hungry later. Could come upon hard times, when I really need that food to survive.” This is a possible explanation, though looking at Dog it is obvious he really doesn’t miss many meals. The bags of doggy-treats on the shelf promise continuing prosperity.
Or Dog could be arguing from a higher moral principle, “I worked hard for that food. It’s my property. If it is taken away by some Socialist and given to some lazy immigrant dog it sets a bad precedent. A slippery-slope we cannot tolerate.”
Or perhaps, “I’m a Patriot! Defending the sanctity of the floor. Any inadvertent destruction is the cost we must pay for Freedom.”
Or, he could just be a stupid dog.
There is no need to add to what you have said.
“There ends the lesson.”