Why Don’t You?
A patient in a large hospital room
with many beds complains to the doctor
about the constant noise other patients are making,
which is driving him crazy.
The doctor replies that nothing can be done,
one cannot forbid the patients from expressing
their despair,
since they all know they are dying.
The first patient responds:
“Why don’t you then put them in a separate room
for those who are dying?”
The doctor replies calmly and glibly:
“But this is a room for those who are dying.”
Interrogating the Real by Slavoj Zizek, p. 13, (London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005)
A few days ago I obtained a book of Zizek’s Jokes. The slim paperback is a compilation of jokes culled from the many books authored by Slavoj Zizek, a widely recognized European intellectual. I like this one especially and wanted to use the joke for a blog entry. This morning, a flash of insight came to me, and now I understand the appeal of this joke.
The vignette is a gem-like exposition of our situation in so many ways here in America. We are surrounded by enduring and dangerous problems, which we are clearly not able to begin to solve. I mean the cascading effect of global warming, the floods occurring on the West coast which are a consequence of atmospheric rivers of moisture streaming from a warming Pacific ocean. The wild fires too, burn great swaths, acres of dry brush, including homes and sometimes small towns.
No detail is needed concerning the immigrants from Central America, and from the failed state of Argentina who find ways to cross our southern border. They run to escape hunger, and the inevitable diseases which are certain to take their children. Exacerbating this alarming circumstance, governors of red state Texas, and Florida initiate programs to bus these desperate people to blue state cities in order to overwhelm the capacity of these places to integrate the immigrants into jobs and housing. The “other” beset by misfortune serve as weapons in the political divide which currently paralyzes the management of our society.
Last night I participated in a small group discussion. Our topic was the gun violence, the deaths and maiming consequent to the easy availability of weapons in our country. There are many measures of response which seemed reasonable to all of us participating in this discussion. Notwithstanding we all understood that little if anything is feasible because of the complexity of the matter. The sanctity of capital, palpable racism, the equivalence of money and political clout, and minds deeply conformed to regional culture — all add up.
Nothing will change. In our cul de sac, the throw-weight of circumstance will run its course.
What do we want? Do we want to end this post on a dark note? Of course not! This tune by Simon & Garfunkel is apt. My Little Town released in 1975.
My Little Town
By Simon & Garfunkel
In my little town
I grew up believing
God keeps his eye on us all
And He used to lean upon me
As I pledged allegiance to the wall
Lord, I recall
My little town
Coming home after school
Flying my bike past the gates
Of the factories
My mom doing the laundry
Hanging our shirts
In the dirty breeze
And after it rains
There’s a rainbow
And all of the colors are black
It’s not that the colors aren’t there
It’s just imagination they lack
Everything’s the same
Back in my little town
Nothing but the dead and dying
Back in my little town
Nothing but the dead and dying
Back in my little town
In my little town
I never meant nothin’
I was just my father’s son
Saving my money
Dreaming of glory
Twitching like a finger
On the trigger of a gun
Leaving nothing but the dead and dying
Back in my little town
Nothing but the dead and dying
Back in my little town
Nothing but the dead and dying
Back in my little town
14 thoughts on “Why Don’t You?”
Strange that you say, “Texas, and Florida initiate programs to bus these desperate people to blue state cities in order to overwhelm the capacity of these places to integrate the immigrants into jobs and housing. ” when the capacity of the small towns in Texas and Florida would be much more overwhelmed.
What about them?
The distribution of immigrants is not the issue. My point is the unilateral way in which this has been done, rebuffing all attempts at consultation, efforts by blue state governors to coordinate with Florida and Texas have been met with silence. No one will pick up the phone… Why not say out loud the truth of the matter? The immigrant situation has been politically weaponized. Human beings used as pawns. You’d have to be blind not to see the racism of the policy.
Desantis and Abbott are perfectly adapted Republican Party animals…
The distribution of immigrants is not my first issue either, the shutting down the flow of immigrants at the border is my issue. But you did comment on how terrible the Governors of Florida and Texas were for sending them on to other states, so, it is an issue. It wouldn’t be if there were no illegals coming into the country.
Just like viruses and bacteria invading your body, they just want to find a nice warm place to live, and you, in all likely hood, will want to get a shot and kill them.
In my world human beings are not “just like viruses.” That is the crux of the disagreement. When will you assert that Jews are viruses? You’d leave your home, and everything you could not carry if staying meant constant hunger, early death for your children. I hope that you’d leave.
I totally agree with you that humans are not viruses. I used that term because some in the philosophy group call a human fetus just a parasite and no one reacted to that. Those who cross our border illegaly are simply breaking the law and should not be allowed in. When to many have arrived it won’t be long until the country they are leaving will be little different than the country that are coming to.
Many who cross the border are seeking asylum, which by law they are allowed to do.
We ought to keep in mind that “the law” is a set of rules made up by individuals who hold power. It was once legal to own human beings. In some states it is now legal to force a female with a problem pregnancy to die of her condition. I can think of nothing in this world that is deserving of mindless obedience. Not the law or anything else. Unless one desires to be a slave.
Until the law is changed it is the law, just like slavery once was legal, it was outlawed. Laws are not always good, but until changed they are the law, I would be against the abortion law you refer to.
As for asylum, you are to declare asylum in the first country you come to, that is being ignored.
Should you ever live in one of the red states with a near total ban on abortion I hope that you’d be strong enough to break the law,- if you could save the life of a pregnant woman.
https://www.npr.org/2022/07/02/1109557947/some-abortions-are-necessary-to-save-the-life-of-a-patient
Can you name a state that will let a woman die?
I do not live in any of those states with draconian anti-abortion laws. I simply read what others have written. Your argument seems to be – “its really not that bad.” I disagree. It is severe, a violation of a citizens right over their own body.
I agree it is a woman’s right, but if democracy is to mean anything then the people in the states you abhor must vote to change their laws. Then again, maybe they have.
I agree it is a woman’s right to an abortion, but if democracy is to mean anything then the people in the states you abhor must vote to change their laws. Then again, maybe they already have.
Maybe some of those you read were mistaken about not saving a woman’s life by allowing an abortion.
I noticed this posting well after it went up so I hope it’s not to late to add to it.
Gary, you asked for a state that will let a woman die rather than have an abortion. How about Texas? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/02/23/texas-woman-ectopic-pregnancy-abortion/ Or Florida? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/10/pprom-florida-abortion-ban/ Are two examples enough? The fact that the women remain alive is despite, not because of, state law.
All other medical care is decided between medical professionals and their patients, not by legislators, so abortion should not be subject to their whims either. If vasectomy were mandated for every male over the age of 50, I daresay law-breaking would be enshrined as libertarian virtue!
I also take exception to Gary’s assertion that “some in the philosophy group call a human fetus just a parasite and no one reacted to that.” I did say that until it has developed enough to survive externally, a fetus is wholly dependent on the resources of its host the same way a parasite is, except the parasite remains dependent permanently. Neither I nor anyone else claimed a human under production is “just” a parasite; the two statements differ significantly.
A succinct response…
‘Parasite’ used as a metaphor is not the same as the claim that something is ostensively a parasite. Perhaps that is too fine a distinction for everyone with both feet planted in the conservative camp.