data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb7d8/cb7d87bd387a2b0d1235ed5e8340c98d4f64e56b" alt=""
The Unteachable
“something unteachable, a granite of spiritual fate” Those written words make me shudder. Do I detect an odor of a timeworn notion of destiny? I mean to say that even with the privilege of education, or perhaps of financial resources, of means – there’s a certain core that is untouchable by any circumstance, a complex of “conviction,” an inviolate, immutable “I”… Learning alters us, of this I do not doubt. And then there’s the “but”.
Bluntly put, is this the “great stupidity”?
Is the impasse between us, the great divide of opinion about who we are, how we (homo sapiens) ought to treat one another – illuminated by this possibility?
What is the “great divide”?
It is the difference between those who believe females are unsuited to sustain equal responsibility and influence as males, and those who believe the contrary.
What do you think?
Learning alters us,
it does what all nourishment does
that does not merely “conserve”–as the physiologist knows.
But at the bottom of our souls, quite “down below,”
there is certainly something unteachable, a granite of spiritual fate,
of predetermined decision and answer to predetermined, chosen questions.
In each cardinal problem
there speaks an unchangeable “I am this”;
a thinker cannot learn anew about man and woman, for instance,
but can only learn fully—
he can only follow to the end
what is “fixed” about them in himself.
Occasionally we find certain solutions of problems
which make strong beliefs for us;
perhaps they are henceforth called “convictions.”
Later on–one sees in them only footsteps to self-knowledge,
guide-posts to the problem which we ourselves ARE
–or more correctly
to the great stupidity which we embody,
our spiritual fate, the UNTEACHABLE in us,
quite “down below.”
Beyond Good and Evil, by Friedrich Nietzsche, trans. by Helen Zimmern, aphorism 231
2 thoughts on “The Unteachable”
In a recent NY Times editorial, David Brooks, discussed the need for emotion in day to day life and how many people eschew emotion to embrace pragmatic reasoning. As always with Mr. Brooks it was an interesting take on life, but this time I only agreed with him to a point. Yes, we should listen to our feelings and incorporate them into decision making, but when emotions take over the rational part of decision making, fear and hate can become the main motivators. And when folks are in the zone of emotion they are indeed, “unteachable” and for the most part unreachable as well. Life must be a balance of everything we are and we have to keep asking questions and examine our motivations, utilizing every means we can, which includes our emotions and our capacity for reasoning.
I am reminded over and over that philosophy is a practice that gives emotion and the body its due while giving reason a nod, as our lifeline. Let us be human echoes in my mind…